Models

Gemma 4

Google DeepMind's open model family for local, multimodal, and agentic AI workflows.

Apache-2.0 License
Open sourceLocal firstSelf-hostedAPI
Gemma 4 Apache-2.0 License deepmind.google verified 2026-06-04
About

Gemma 4 overview

Gemma 4 is a family of Apache 2.0 open models from Google DeepMind, designed for reasoning, multimodal inputs, edge deployments, and developer workflows that need more control than hosted-only APIs.

Open model family with practical size range

Gemma 4 includes multiple model sizes, from edge-oriented variants to larger models for more demanding workloads.

That range lets builders choose between local responsiveness, hardware cost, and model capability instead of treating open AI as one deployment pattern.

Multimodal and agentic workflow focus

Google positions Gemma 4 for more than simple chat, including multimodal inputs and structured workflows where models need to reason across steps.

This makes it more relevant to builders working on assistants, tool-using agents, document workflows, and visual understanding tasks.

Broad ecosystem support

The launch connects Gemma 4 to Google AI Studio, AI Edge Gallery, Hugging Face, and common local inference tools.

A model family is easier to evaluate when developers can try it through familiar runtimes rather than waiting for a single official serving path.
Use cases

When to use Gemma 4

Local AI product experiments

Use Gemma 4 to test whether a feature can run on local hardware or self-hosted infrastructure before committing to a hosted-only architecture.

Multimodal document and image workflows

The family is relevant for apps that combine text with image understanding, such as visual review, document triage, and assistant-style analysis.

Agentic tool workflows

Gemma 4 is worth evaluating when a workflow needs reasoning across steps, structured outputs, or tool-oriented behavior.

Edge and mobile AI prototypes

The smaller variants are aimed at low-latency and edge use cases where sending every request to a remote model is not ideal.

Compare

How it compares

Choose Gemma 4 when open weights and local control matter vs Gemini

Gemini remains Google's flagship hosted model stack, while Gemma 4 is the better fit when you want downloadable weights, local experimentation, and more deployment control.

Compare carefully against other open model families vs Llama, Qwen, Mistral

Gemma 4's appeal is its Google research lineage, Apache 2.0 license, and multimodal direction, but teams should still benchmark it against nearby open models on their own tasks.

FAQ

Questions

What should I check before using Gemma 4?

Run Gemma 4 on a fixed prompt set from your own workflow. Compare quality, latency, context handling, retry behavior, deployment path, and license fit against nearby open models before adopting it.

Is Gemma 4 open source?

Gemma 4 is listed with Apache-2.0 based on the official source links in this profile. Re-check the repository, model card, or docs before production use.

Who should evaluate Gemma 4?

Gemma 4 is most worth evaluating for developers evaluating open models for local or self-hosted AI apps.

Is Gemma 4 a replacement for Gemini?

No. Gemma 4 is better understood as Google's open model family for developers who need more control, while Gemini remains Google's hosted flagship model line.

Tags

Capabilities

local inferenceopen sourceself hostedlocal firstopen weightslocal aiself hosted ai
Decision brief

Should you use Gemma 4?

JSON
Best for
  • Developers evaluating open models for local or self-hosted AI apps
  • Teams that need multimodal reasoning without depending only on hosted APIs
  • Builders comparing small edge models against larger workstation-grade open models
  • Researchers and product teams that want Apache 2.0 model weights from a major lab
Not for
  • Users who want a fully managed consumer assistant
  • Teams that do not want to handle model serving, safety testing, or deployment details
  • Workflows that require guaranteed hosted SLA support from the model provider
Trust and freshness
  • Verified 2026-06-04
  • License: Apache-2.0
  • No GitHub repo recorded
  • Open-source signal
Deployment

local, self hosted, cloud

Permission surface

external services

Decision signals

Local first, Self-hostable, API

Agent packet

Structured decision data for Gemma 4

This packet is the compact machine-readable view agents should use before following source links or taking action.

Capabilities

local inference

Constraints

open source, self hosted, local first, open weights

Deployment

local, self hosted, cloud

Permission surface

external services

Recommended workflows

Evaluation and observability, Local or private AI stack

Overview

What Gemma 4 does

What it is

Gemma 4 is an open model resource to evaluate by workload, serving path, context behavior, license terms, and how reliably it supports the agent or local AI tasks you actually plan to run.

Why it matters

Open model adoption depends on two things: strong base capability and practical deployment paths. Gemma 4 is important because it pushes both at once. For builders, that means the same project can start with a hosted experiment, move into local testing, and later compare edge or self-hosted deployment without changing the overall model family.

How to evaluate it

Run Gemma 4 on a fixed prompt set from your own workflow. Compare quality, latency, context handling, retry behavior, deployment path, and license fit against nearby open models before adopting it.

Facts

Known metadata and operating surface

These fields are separated from editorial interpretation so agents can reason over facts and missing checks.

Resource type model
Category Models
Maturity active
Difficulty Unknown
License Apache-2.0
Pricing open source
Verified 2026-06-04
Source confidence medium
Risk level moderate
Fit matrix

Where Gemma 4 fits in an agent stack

strong

Evaluation and observability

Gemma 4 has multiple signals for evaluation and observability, including matching tags, capabilities, category, or positioning.

  • Add one repeatable test case and confirm results can run again in review or CI.
  • Confirm official docs, current maintenance, license, and runtime constraints before production use.
strong

Local or private AI stack

Gemma 4 has multiple signals for local or private ai stack, including matching tags, capabilities, category, or positioning.

  • Verify hardware requirements, data path, storage, and whether all calls stay in your environment.
  • Confirm official docs, current maintenance, license, and runtime constraints before production use.
partial

Connector or protocol layer

Gemma 4 has at least one signal for connector or protocol layer, but should be checked against a real task before adoption.

  • Connect one low-risk service, then inspect schemas, auth scope, errors, and logs.
  • Confirm official docs, current maintenance, license, and runtime constraints before production use.
partial

Reusable skill workflow

Gemma 4 has at least one signal for reusable skill workflow, but should be checked against a real task before adoption.

  • Run one skill end to end and check whether it produces evidence or structured output.
  • Confirm official docs, current maintenance, license, and runtime constraints before production use.
weak

Browser automation

Gemma 4 is not primarily positioned for browser automation in the current metadata.

  • Run one non-sensitive website task and inspect clicks, waits, retries, and changed URLs.
  • Confirm official docs, current maintenance, license, and runtime constraints before production use.
weak

Coding agent workflow

Gemma 4 is not primarily positioned for coding agent workflow in the current metadata.

  • Run a small repository change and inspect the diff, tests, and rollback path.
  • Confirm official docs, current maintenance, license, and runtime constraints before production use.
Inputs and outputs

What an agent should inspect

Likely inputs

  • Tool schemas, API requests, service resources, and auth scopes
  • Prompts, messages, documents, images, or model inputs
  • Official setup instructions and a small real workflow

Likely outputs

  • Scores, traces, regression results, dashboards, or failure cases
  • A decision on whether this resource fits the target workflow
Evidence

Sources, claims, and missing checks

Claims are marked separately from source links so future crawlers and reviewers can update them without rewriting the page.

Next action

How to start evaluating Gemma 4

Open Homepage

Start from the official source before adopting third-party instructions.

Open source

Read setup docs

Use docs as the source of truth for installation and supported interfaces.

Open source

Open Demo

Start from the official source before adopting third-party instructions.

Open source

Run a workstation model with Ollama

Use this after installing Ollama and confirming your machine has enough memory for the 26B variant.

ollama run gemma4:26b

Run the smaller edge-oriented variant

Use the smaller variant when you want a lighter local test before trying larger Gemma 4 models.

ollama run gemma4:e2b
Compare

Alternatives and nearby resources

Use related resources to compare category fit, license, deployment model, and first-workflow behavior.

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4

What should I check before using Gemma 4?

Run Gemma 4 on a fixed prompt set from your own workflow. Compare quality, latency, context handling, retry behavior, deployment path, and license fit against nearby open models before adopting it.

Is Gemma 4 open source?

Gemma 4 is listed with Apache-2.0 based on the official source links in this profile. Re-check the repository, model card, or docs before production use.

Who should evaluate Gemma 4?

Gemma 4 is most worth evaluating for developers evaluating open models for local or self-hosted AI apps.

Is Gemma 4 a replacement for Gemini?

No. Gemma 4 is better understood as Google's open model family for developers who need more control, while Gemini remains Google's hosted flagship model line.

Should I use Gemma 4 for agent workflows?

It is worth testing for agent-style workflows, especially where local control or open weights matter, but you should benchmark structured output, tool behavior, latency, and failure modes on your own tasks.